By our War Descalation Specialist.

It seems that that the Russian Armed Forces are primarily fighting Civillian people more than the organised Ukraine Armed Forces. Perhaps that’s why the Russians are more cautious whilst fighting a full fledged ground war. They cannot afford to kill their own old time comrades and relatives of the earstwhile USSR. Thus, 11 days have passed and no war field reports have surfaced of them securing their old time USSR Kiev city.

In a certain manner of speaking, for Russia, Ukraine is a child’s play comparing Russia’s Military Might, both from the seas and land and Air.

Xxxxxxxxxx.

We mention below the Odds and Evens faced by Russian Armed Forces if at all NATO FORCES decide to confront Russian Forces in a Full Scale War.

WHO IS NATO, WHAT IS NATO?

[ IN CONTEXT OF TODAY’S SPECIAL FORCES WAR BETWEEN RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND UKRAINE. ]

THE FOLLOWING COUNTRIES ARE THE MEMBERS OF NATO.

( NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANISATION. )





The most important players in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization are the member countries themselves.

THERE ARE CURRENTLY 30 MEMBERS

ALBANIA (2009)

BELGIUM (1949)

BULGARIA (2004)

CANADA (1949)

CROATIA (2009)

CZECH REPUBLIC (1999)

DENMARK (1949)

ESTONIA (2004)

FRANCE (1949)

GERMANY (1955)

GREECE (1952)

HUNGARY (1999)

ICELAND (1949)

ITALY (1949)

LATVIA (2004)

LITHUANIA (2004)

LUXEMBOURG (1949)

MONTENEGRO (2017)

NETHERLANDS (1949)

NORTH MACEDONIA (2020)

NORWAY (1949)

POLAND (1999)

PORTUGAL (1949)

ROMANIA (2004)

SLOVAKIA (2004)

SLOVENIA (2004)

SPAIN (1982)

TURKEY (1952)

THE UNITED KINGDOM (1949)

THE UNITED STATES (1949 )

North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), military alliance established by the North Atlantic Treaty (also called the Washington Treaty) of April 4, 1949, which sought to create a counterweight to Soviet armies stationed in central and eastern Europe after World War II.

Every day, member countries consult and take decisions on security issues at all levels and in a variety of fields.
A “NATO decision” is the expression of the collective will of all 30 member countries since all decisions are taken by consensus.
Hundreds of officials, as well as civilian and military experts, come to NATO Headquarters each day to exchange information, share ideas and help prepare decisions when needed, in cooperation with national delegations and the staff at NATO Headquarters.

NATO DELEGATIONS

Each member country has a permanent delegation at NATO’s political headquarters in Brussels. Each delegation is headed by an “ambassador”, who represents his/her government in the Alliance’s consultation and decision-making process.

THE NUCLEAR PLANNING GROUP

The Nuclear Planning Group has the same authority as the North Atlantic Council with regard to nuclear policy issues.

THE NAC: AT THE HEART OF NATO

The North Atlantic Council (NAC) is the principal political decision-making body at NATO. Each member country has a seat at the NAC.
It meets at least once a week or whenever the need arises, at different levels. It is chaired by the Secretary General who helps members reach agreement on key issues.

SUBORDINATE COMMITTEES

NATO has a network of committees to deal with all subjects on its agenda, from political to more technical issues. They bring national representatives and experts from all NATO member countries together on a regular basis.

NATO AGENCIES

NATO agencies and organisations play a vital role in procuring and sustaining capabilities collectively. They specialise in technical fields that complement and form an integral part of NATO’s agenda: procurement, support and communications and information.

THE SECRETARY GENERAL

The Secretary General is the Alliance’s top international civil servant. He/she is responsible for steering the process of consultation and decision-making within the Alliance and ensuring that decisions are implemented. The Secretary General is also NATO’s chief spokesperson and heads the Organisation’s International Staff, which provides advice, guidance and administrative support to the national delegations at NATO NATO Headquarters.

MILITARY ORGANISATION AND STRUCTURE

When the implementation of political decisions has military implications, the key actors involved are: the Military Committee, composed of the Chiefs of Defence of NATO member countries; the International Military Staff, the Military Committee’s executive body; and the military command structure, composed of Allied Command Operations and Allied Command Transformation.
NATO has very few permanent forces of its own. When the North Atlantic Council agrees to launch an operation, members contribute military forces on a voluntary basis. These forces then return to their countries once the mission is completed.

Xxxxxxxxxx.

A COMPARISON BETWEEN NATO FORCES ANDCRUSSIAN FORCES.

NATO allies together have a personnel count of 5.41 million, compared to Russia’s 1.35 million, according to the graphic that was the same as Statista’s figures.
It also found NATO allies had 144,000 armored units, more than double that of Russia’s 60,000, again a similar number to Statista.

NATO once more outnumbered Russia with 20,700 aircraft, a factor of nearly five to one when compared to Russia’s 4,170.

Russia is also outnumbered in regard to its naval forces, which number 605—far lower than NATO’s 2,049—once again a similar number to Statista.
However, the graphic did highlight one area where Russia has numerical superiority over NATO allies, namely nuclear weapons

The graphic, which had the same numbers as Statista, revealed NATO has 6,065 nuclear weapons while Russia alone has 6,255.

After being posted online, the graphic attracted thousands of comments from people who shared their opinions about Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine.

While the sheer size of both Russia and NATO’s military forces attracted concern, it was the nuclear arsenals that drew the most comments from users.
One said: “Way too many nukes for comfort.” Another added: “You can shoot down a few, but you can’t shoot down all of them. It’s guaranteed destruction

A commenter mentioned how Ukraine voluntarily destroyed hundreds of nuclear weapons which it inherited following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

The Reddit user posted: “Ukraine is the lesson for what happens to a nuclear-free country who minds their own business.
“[Ukraine] freely gave up the world’s third-largest nuclear arsenal in exchange of guarantees of its sovereignty from Russia, the U.K. and the U.S.”
Newsweek has contacted u/lestaz_ for comment.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has raised tensions amid the ongoing conflict after raising the country’s readiness to use nuclear weapons.

On Sunday, Putin declared that his country’s nuclear forces were to be put into special “combat readiness.”
In 2021, the Arms Control Association estimated the U.S. has 5,550 nuclear weapons.

XXXXXXXXXX

So in a very practical method of explanation, it is clearly understood that NATO COUNTRIES HOLD 5 TIMES MORE POWER THAN 1 TIME RUSSIAN STRENGTH.

5 to 1 are the odds which Russia has to face from NATO MEMBER COUNTRIES.

It is therefore, no wonder that the highly mature and experienced countries of NATO are handling Russian Armed Forces with Kid Gloves.

A special observation noted by us here.

In the 1980’s Ronald Reagan told the public and Jimmy Carter that they need to descalate Nuclear Warheads production. If you place one train bogie and continue to connect such bogies from North to South and from East to West boundaries of the USA, and fill up those bogies with nuclear arsenal, there would still be a lot extra nuclear bombs available.

Leonid Brehznev commented nothing much in USSR as President of that country. But he surely agreed later on that the world would be safer with Nuclear Non Proliferation procedures put in place.

TODAY, AFTER 42 YEARS OF SUCH PAST EVENTS, WE THE NEW AND YOUNGER GENERATION SAY THAT,

FIRST OF ALL, THEY SHOULD CHECK UP THEIR DETONATION EQUIPMENT ATTACHED TO THE NUCLEAR WAR HEADS. Will these obsolete things work properly?

2.) Check up whether those launch pads are electronically active deep underground the Earth’s surface. Will these outdated and very old things burst there and then under the ground of the same country?

3.) Confirm whether those Nucleus inside the Atoms are now, about 50 years later, capable of fission OR fusion. This is not the Hiroshima or Nagasaki era of the 1945 C.E.

Today’s public population is not scared of confrontation but being civillians, they are more concerned about the coming younger generation and their propagation.

Then again, we have international hackers who can divert any ICBM to any target immediately they are fired from base. Remember, this is the 2022 C.E. Age and Era. Anything is possible. Its called or rather termed, Remote Assistance or 2.) Remote Control. So we need to be very careful whilst handling such outdated and obsolete equipment. Military Planes, Tanks, Ships, etc. Are serviced everyday by experienced and qualified technicians. They are appointed by the Governments for such purposes. But what about 50 years old missiles. What if these burst under your seats immediately after activation? What if the missiles turn around in the sky and hit the same place of emergence or activation?

We have witnessed what hapoened in 2019 from Hong Kong to Germany and in between. Today, people are now crying out for War revenge and the reverse War Cries can be heard till the skies. They reverbrate more than all the Air Force planes flying together.

What if a billion civillians march to H.Q’s with only sticks and swords in their hands, AFTER,

the fire power, bombs, shells, missiles and bullets are exhausted?

Today the world population is more than 8 billion people.

in 1945, when the Hydrogen Bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the world population was about 2 billion people.

We suggest that they better not play around with outdated and old toys.

Otherwise, all hell will break loose.