CBI arrests CGST Additional Commissioner, Superintendent in Rs. 40 lakh bribery case.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has arrested an Indian Revenue Service (IRS) officer posted as the Additional Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) in Raigad, Maharashtra.

A CGST Superintendent from Raigad and a private individual were also arrested in connection with a Rs 40 lakh bribery case. SouthAsians & Diaspora

The arrests of Vinay Kumar Kantheti (IRS- 2009 batch), serving as Additional Commissioner of GST, and Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Superintendent of GST, took place on Thursday, a day after the CBI registered a case against the CGST Superintendent on Wednesday. The private individual has been identified as Narinder Rajput.

The officer is accused of demanding Rs 1.50 crore from the complainant to settle a GST and royalty dispute involving a stone-quarrying company. After some negotiation, the amount was reduced to Rs 40 lakh.

The two officials reportedly asked a private person to collect the bribe and told the complainant to give the money to him. The CBI set up a trap and caught the private person while he was accepting the Rs 40 lakh bribe.

The CBI said both the CGST Superintendent and the Additional Commissioner later accepted the bribe. All three people have been arrested and will be brought to court. During searches at their homes, officials found another Rs 43 lakh in cash and jewellery worth about Rs 90 lakh. The CBI also said the investigation is still going on.

Raigad district, located in Maharashtra’s Konkan region, has extensive stone quarrying. These businesses have to comply with GST rules, pay royalties to the government, and obtain clearances from the CGST authorities.

This case shows that illegal demands can happen during tax and royalty disputes. The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended) treats the asking for and acceptance of bribes by public servants as a serious crime.

The fact that both a senior IRS officer and a Superintendent were involved suggests there may have been collusion at different levels in the same office. Using a private person to collect the bribe is a common method in similar cases.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has arrested an Indian Revenue Service (IRS) officer posted as the Additional Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) in Raigad, Maharashtra.

A CGST Superintendent from Raigad and a private individual were also arrested in connection with a Rs 40 lakh bribery case. SouthAsians & Diaspora

The arrests of Vinay Kumar Kantheti (IRS- 2009 batch), serving as Additional Commissioner of GST, and Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Superintendent of GST, took place on Thursday, a day after the CBI registered a case against the CGST Superintendent on Wednesday. The private individual has been identified as Narinder Rajput.

The officer is accused of demanding Rs 1.50 crore from the complainant to settle a GST and royalty dispute involving a stone-quarrying company. After some negotiation, the amount was reduced to Rs 40 lakh.

The two officials reportedly asked a private person to collect the bribe and told the complainant to give the money to him. The CBI set up a trap and caught the private person while he was accepting the Rs 40 lakh bribe.

The CBI said both the CGST Superintendent and the Additional Commissioner later accepted the bribe.

All three people have been arrested and will be brought to court. During searches at their homes, officials found another Rs 43 lakh in cash and jewellery worth about Rs 90 lakh. The CBI also said the investigation is still going on.

Raigad district, located in Maharashtra’s Konkan region, has extensive stone quarrying. These businesses have to comply with GST rules, pay royalties to the government, and obtain clearances from the CGST authorities.

This case shows that illegal demands can happen during tax and royalty disputes. The Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended) treats the asking for and acceptance of bribes by public servants as a serious crime.

The fact that both a senior IRS officer and a Superintendent were involved suggests there may have been collusion at different levels in the same office. Using a private person to collect the bribe is a common method in similar cases.